The whispered sentiment in hallways and backrooms at the ORT/Interoperability Summit in Tampa this week is that IBTTA has missed the boat on interoperability since 1990...or before.
Indeed, the notion that we missed the boat is perhaps the most relentlessly whispered sentiment at any IBTTA meeting I have ever attended. To paraphrase the bible, "where two or three toll professionals are gathered, there is regret among them."
Hmm. If we "missed the boat," how could IBTTA have "gotten on the boat" back in 1990 or in any year since then? Would getting on the boat have meant assembling all of the smartest minds in the toll industry in one room to come up with THE SOLUTION for interoperability once and for all? Should the industry have selected the one and only technology solution that everyone would use so that we would never struggle with having different jurisdictions embracing different, incompatible technologies? Should we have forced everyone to adopt the technology and systems of VENDOR A (at the expense of VENDORS B, C, D, E...) so that we could enjoy the benefits of interoperable all electronic tolling and multilane free flow everywhere in North America...or dare I say, the world?
Should we have forced the entire industry to embrace the next generation electronic toll collection performance specification that was developed by a working group of IBTTA in the early 2000s, and which was acknowledged, supported, and approved by the IBTTA Board of Directors as the smart way to go, but which individual agencies turned away from because (fill in the blank -- each agency had a different reason)?
It's an interesting mental exercise to consider what could have, should have, or might have been. However, the most important thing we can do is consider WHAT IS, here and now, and what we can do NOW to make the world (including interoperability) a better place. We cannot change the past. I repeat: we cannot change the past. We cannot change the decisions, actions, or lack of actions that IBTTA, the toll industry, all of its vendors and agencies made or didn't make in the past. We live here, today, on June 15, 2009. We think and live in the present. We can learn from the past. But we should not burden ourselves with it.
Let's embrace the possibility that a new day brings. Let's embrace the possibility that we can learn from the past and make even better decisions today than we made in the past. Let's embrace the possibility that our future will be more orderly and less chaotic than what the past, in our mind's eye, appears to have been.
-- Pat Jones
Monday, June 15, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
A true commitment is deeply needed from the industry in general in favour of such possibility of learning from the past, perfect, how about starting doing something real on simple matters like standardization, open platforms, multi vendors from multi technologies, real toll collection integration and eficiency with clear business rules for all players and a profund respect towards the CUSTOMER, he's money and he's safety?
ReplyDeleteThis comment comes from Maurizio Rotondo who is the International Vice President of IBTTA from the Italian Association, AISCAT.
ReplyDeletePat, I actually regret not being there!
as for having "missed the boat", I have two thoughts. 1) interoperability, or standardization, have always been a battleground for manufacturers, not only in tolling; just remember compact cassette vs stereo 8, VHS vs Betamax, or the more recent Blue Ray vs HD DVD, GSM vs ETACS, Sony HDTV vs ....everyone else HDTV etc. Every sector missed a boat one or more times, always because industrial interests prevailed over the concepts of service, clients, users. No sectorial association could ever do anything about that because whenever a conflict is present between or among its members the association will stay neutral. Please do not let anyone blame IBTTA for something IBTTA could not possibly be in control of.
2) Again and again, interoperability is misunderstood as a technology issue only, whilst interoperability is a mix of technology/legal/fiscal driven issues, A plastic card featuring a ISO magnetic strip does not necessarily make a credit card, it takes contracts, signatures, warranties etc.; unless the tolling industry gets rid of the reductive concept that interoperability is a fight among 900 mhz vs 5,9 ghz vs satellite vs merlin's wand, the boat will always be missed, not by IBTTA, rather by the entire tolling industry.
best success down there, see you in Denver.
Maurizio